The man was complicit in extreme coercion of people to be injected by an experimental mRNA gene therapy that was pushed as exactly for what it was, a murderous bio weapon. At best he is a weasel, a thug, and an absolute upstart creep.
Those that called out the saga from its very beginning as a sinister Global criminal conspiracy were not theorists, they were rational thinkers that recognised the obvious that was so blatant, so perverse, so obtuse, that the only explanation beyond propagandists like this fellow was the "Stockholm Syndrome".
My use of this term to describe what I was seeing saw me kicked off YouTube and silenced on ABC sites where comment was only welcome from fools and fear mongers. The first few days before my comments on the ABC were blocked, overwhelming the comments were pro the massive over reaction, with what I saw as the single most pathetically delusional response to my warning comments was "not in this day and age".
Now Karl has seen the light, now Karl is in a position to expose, is he going to push for an inquiry into the whole hamful process, government and pharmaceutical, no , Karl is just going to continue being virtuous, Karl will continue treading on the injured.
They’ll all do the exact same thing on the next one.
The problem isn’t having the right ideas (it’s fashionable to be against covid now) - it’s that they are unable to have an original thought outside of the permission of the collective - and that their power relies on that collective and so they litigate its prejudices (which they also experience as inheriting horizontally (we think this) as opposed to vertically (I have been instructed to think this)).
The man was complicit in extreme coercion of people to be injected by an experimental mRNA gene therapy that was pushed as exactly for what it was, a murderous bio weapon. At best he is a weasel, a thug, and an absolute upstart creep.
Those that called out the saga from its very beginning as a sinister Global criminal conspiracy were not theorists, they were rational thinkers that recognised the obvious that was so blatant, so perverse, so obtuse, that the only explanation beyond propagandists like this fellow was the "Stockholm Syndrome".
My use of this term to describe what I was seeing saw me kicked off YouTube and silenced on ABC sites where comment was only welcome from fools and fear mongers. The first few days before my comments on the ABC were blocked, overwhelming the comments were pro the massive over reaction, with what I saw as the single most pathetically delusional response to my warning comments was "not in this day and age".
Now Karl has seen the light, now Karl is in a position to expose, is he going to push for an inquiry into the whole hamful process, government and pharmaceutical, no , Karl is just going to continue being virtuous, Karl will continue treading on the injured.
They’ll all do the exact same thing on the next one.
The problem isn’t having the right ideas (it’s fashionable to be against covid now) - it’s that they are unable to have an original thought outside of the permission of the collective - and that their power relies on that collective and so they litigate its prejudices (which they also experience as inheriting horizontally (we think this) as opposed to vertically (I have been instructed to think this)).